<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>moorepants - research</title><link href="https://moorepants.info/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://moorepants.info/feeds/research.atom.xml" rel="self"/><id>https://moorepants.info/</id><updated>2026-11-08T11:14:00-08:00</updated><subtitle>a websitee</subtitle><entry><title>My Dutch Open Science Festival Talks</title><link href="https://moorepants.info/blog/my-dutch-open-science-festival-talks.html" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-11-08T11:14:00-08:00</published><updated>2026-11-08T11:14:00-08:00</updated><author><name>Jason K. Moore</name></author><id>tag:moorepants.info,2026-11-08:/blog/my-dutch-open-science-festival-talks.html</id><summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;I gave two lightning talks at the 2026 Dutch Open Science Festival. My first
experience with lightning talks were at SciPy, PyData, and PyCon conferences so
I formulated the talks in that vein, but I seemed to be the only person that
took the tongue-cheek-approach. Oh well...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My first talk …&lt;/p&gt;</summary><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I gave two lightning talks at the 2026 Dutch Open Science Festival. My first
experience with lightning talks were at SciPy, PyData, and PyCon conferences so
I formulated the talks in that vein, but I seemed to be the only person that
took the tongue-cheek-approach. Oh well...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My first talk was more-or-less a public service announcement to utilize &lt;a class="reference external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-archiving"&gt;Green
Open Access&lt;/a&gt;. I'm not sure my
research peers are always aware of the nuances in open access choices, but once
I got to the conference I realized that my peers were not really present, it
was mostly all the open science related support staff. Librarians are likely
keenly aware of what Green Open Access is and I think that was my audience. So
I may have just been preaching to the choir on this talk. Here are the slides:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;iframe
src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vRLOugaifRrHFVa3jX2KPpS3LR0ZXZUBzdTWMwIjOhN1vzVqJUUiTDYXRqCSlhgoqJgJ35jhrRVjcx8/pubembed?start=false&amp;loop=false&amp;delayms=3000"
frameborder="0" width="960" height="569" allowfullscreen="true"
mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately the moderator left no time for Q &amp;amp; A, so I'm not sure how the
talk was received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My second talk was much more well received (at least according to the engaging
post-talk Q &amp;amp; A!). I was warmed up for this talk and very happy with the
delivery. In the talk, I give some introduction to the disregard generative AI
model builders have towards copyrighted materials and raise the concern that
both copyright is ignored and that current copyright laws may not protect human
labor in the age of AI. I've been worried about license dilution with AI
contributions to SymPy since the introduction of the new tools and &lt;a class="reference external" href="https://pirsquared.org/blog/current-challenges-in-free-software-and-open-source-development.html"&gt;Paul
Ivanov's talk from a year ago&lt;/a&gt;
did a great job putting such thoughts into words. Here is my short expression
of similar ideas:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;iframe
src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vSMtsuqhbMS-UU80GSm-2Uq-51Zv7UaYgQGTeBtgwvKUmHR_0sNcMGtaDjx82f3AgdLJJZLMvEtVFqZ/pubembed?start=false&amp;loop=false&amp;delayms=3000"
frameborder="0" width="960" height="569" allowfullscreen="true"
mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</content><category term="research"/><category term="open science"/><category term="copyright"/><category term="open access"/></entry></feed>